Skip to main content

Why can't Democrats win elections anymore?

Some progressives have been asking, "If Trump is so unpopular, why do Democrats keep losing?" This is a complex question with no one easy answer.

First of all, Trump is still popular among Republicans, particularly in rural areas. Even among traditional conservatives unhappy with Trump, we haven't seen much of a "negative coattail effect" of Trump dragging Republicans down.

Secondly, the five special elections that have all gone to the GOP have been in traditionally Republican districts that are also heavily gerrymandered to divide Democratic support.

It's also important to note that Democratic and Republican voters are very different. Republicans tend to be whiter, older, and rural or suburban. Democrats tend to be younger, better educated, urban, and ethnically diverse. These are obviously gross over-generalizations with many exceptions, but they are consistent with current demographics.

So what happens before they enter the voting booth? Potential Democratic voters often read their candidates' statements or voting records. They say things like, "In 1993 the Democrat voted against a gun control bill, so even though he now supports gun control he's not a 'true progressive.' I'm voting for Sally Schmegegge on the Chartreuse Party ticket." Or, "Even though the Democrat sponsored tougher financial industry regulations, she once served on an advisory board at Goldman Sachs, so she's obviously in the pocket of the corporations. Since both parties are corporate-owned, I'm not voting as a protest."

By contrast, Republican voters say, "I have no idea what the GOP candidate has done, but they're all crooks anyway, so what's the difference? All I know is that Democrats always want to raise taxes, and they let those disgusting queers get married. And they give money -- my tax money -- to illegal aliens! So I'm voting for what's-his-name on the Republican ticket." None of what they believe is true, of course, but they've heard the lies literally hundreds of times on Fox News or AM talk radio, and now they're 100% convinced that they're true.

So the DNC must give up the idea that if they tack toward the center -- if they sound like "GOP Lite" -- they will pick up the independents, and maybe woo a few disenchanted Republicans. It obviously hasn't worked. Republicans will ALWAYS vote Republican, no matter who's running. And independents are looking for a strong message. "We're sort of like Republicans, only not as evil" is NOT a strong message; in fact, it's no message at all.

Sum up the Republican message in four words. If you're like most people, you'll probably say, "Smaller government, lower taxes." In fact, Republicans rarely live up to that message. But every Republican stays on message, no matter what, so that even people who hate Republicans can recite it in their sleep. Now sum up the Democratic message in four words. No? Try six. Or ten. Can't do it, can you? That's because Democrats don't have a single coherent message. "Preserving the social safety net for all and providing better economic and educational opportunities for the disadvantaged" doesn't exactly trip off the tongue, does it?

Democrats must begin to assume that the average American voter has the attention span of a goldfish, and market themselves accordingly. What would happen if you could get people to answer, "What's the Democrats' message?" with, say, "Higher wages, social justice?" Might that inspire a few more voters to choose the candidate in the "D" column?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No, I Don't Empathize With Trump Voters

Today I watched a brief video before the main feature at my local independent cinema. It opened on a slide that said, "This is in response to recent events that have occurred as a consequence of changes in government policy." It then showed people of all races, religions, genders, and sexual orientations stating that we are all one, that our strength comes from our diversity. It was clear that it was intended as a refutation of Trump's immigration policy and Muslim ban. It received an enthusiastic round of applause from the 60 or so patrons seated in that theater in suburban Huntington, New York. I couldn't help but wonder what kind of reception it would have gotten in Mobile or Biloxi. Well, I wholeheartedly approve of the video's message. So is this going to be a Kumbaya moment, another olive branch shakily offered to Trump supporters, a heartfelt plea imploring, "Can't we all just get along?" In a word: NO. I for one am sick and tired of bei...

Values? What Values?

A political columnist wrote that liberals should stop asking how poor whites in Middle America could keep voting against their own economic interests because it's the wrong question. "People don't vote with their wallets," he observed. "They vote for their values." And those values presumably have something to do with more guns, fewer immigrants, and no gays marrying each other. I'm not so sure that people never vote with their wallets. One sure way to pick up votes is to promise to lower taxes. But if you promise that, you'd better deliver. Just ask George HW Bush, who won after promising no new taxes, then lost re-election when he reneged on that promise. Then there is the question of the evangelicals. Where did they stash their "Christian values" when they came out overwhelmingly in support of the pussy-grabbing, twice-divorced Donald Trump? It's been suggested that they were just being practical -- that they saw a chance to fill...

The (P)-Value of Human Experience; or, Numbers Don't Lie, but People with Numbers Might

Which is more valuable: statistics or experience? Don't answer right away; take all the time you need. I'll wait. This question isn't as obvious as you might think, and the first answer you're tempted to give might not be the one you decide to stick with. Humans are not born statisticians. Let's face it, most of us are lousy at statistics. My brilliant friend Julia Galef, who publishes articles, hosts podcasts, and gives TED talks on rationality, holds a degree in statistics from Columbia, and can quote you statistical formulas like nobody's business -- but even she decided not to make her living as a statistician. We tend to trust personal experience more than abstract numbers. This works very well for children. Once you've burned your hand on a hot stove, you've learned to be careful around stoves. Once you've been stung by a bee, you'll always be wary of bees -- and probably a whole lot of harmless insects that happen to look like bees. ...