Skip to main content

Gun Control: An Immodest Proposal

This is likely to be a rather unpopular blog entry. In fact, I may take as much heat from my friends on the left as from my enemies on the right. I'll be accused of "making a bad situation worse instead of better." I'll be accused of "playing right into the hands of the crazies." Maybe those who say that will ultimately be proven right. Nevertheless, hear me out. Or don't; you're free to choose just how wide or narrow your range of incoming information is.

Anyway, what prompted me to write this was a news report I read this morning. It said that three Republican Senators, including Rand Paul from Kentucky, intend to block a bill that would expand background checks before gun sales, that has strong bipartisan support, and that Trump says he is eager to sign. This is essentially identical to what happened shortly after the Sandy Hook massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, when a bipartisan bill to expand background checks was blocked by two Republican Senators.

This is the nightmare Groundhog Day is which our nation is trapped. A score or so of innocent children are blown away by an angry, disenfranchised loner with a military grade weapon he should never have gotten his hands on. Conservatives offer "thoughts and prayers." Decent, caring people all over the country demand that "something be done." The NRA starts screaming that "liberals are trying to take away everyone's freedom." A bipartisan bill is defeated by a few Republican lawmakers who are in the pocket of the gun lobby. Pause; repeat sequence. Pause; repeat sequence. Pause; repeat sequence.

So here's my proposal. My fellow liberals are always trying to placate the rabid, "from-my-cold-dead-hand" gun fetishists who scream, "Liberals want to repeal the Second Amendment! Liberals want to take all our guns away!" They reassure them, "No one wants to repeal the Second Amendment; no one wants to take your guns away."

I am now convinced that this is the wrong approach. It convinces gun proponents that we are weak and can be easily intimidated. They are, after all, the loud,crazy ones; we're the ones proposing "sensible solutions" and "reasonable regulations," and loud and crazy always beats sensible and reasonable.

Instead, we need to call their bluff. We need to start screaming, "Repeal the Second Amendment!" over and over, every chance we get. We need to demand "No guns anywhere, ever." Put it on bumper stickers. Wear it on tee shirts. When TV news people ask us, "Don't you think this is going too far?" we need to shout, "No! Not far enough!"

Why do this? To frighten the gun lobby. We need to scare them out of their wits. We need to make them live in as much fear as our children do when they go to school, or as the rest of feel just going about our business. We need to show them that we're done living in fear of being shot for no reason on a random day; if the thing that scare them most is losing their guns, then by all means it is THEY who must now live in fear.

Some will say, "But this is exactly what they've been saying all along -- that liberals want to take their guns. They're just going to adopt a bunker mentality and hold onto their guns even harder." Temporarily, that's true. But once that happens, we'll be in a position for moderate and liberal lawmakers to say, "Okay, instead of repealing the Second Amendment and confiscating everyone's guns, we're just going to try expanding universal background checks, and also banning bump stocks, semiautomatic rifles, and high-capacity magazines, and see how that goes." My guess is that terrified gun fanatics will breathe a sigh of relief and go along with it. Hell, they'll probably think THEY won, because we "backed off" and didn't take their guns.

So that's my proposal. Don't ask for less that what you want and get nothing; demand way more than what you want and get what you really wanted all along. It's an old gambit, but it just might work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Values? What Values?

A political columnist wrote that liberals should stop asking how poor whites in Middle America could keep voting against their own economic interests because it's the wrong question. "People don't vote with their wallets," he observed. "They vote for their values." And those values presumably have something to do with more guns, fewer immigrants, and no gays marrying each other. I'm not so sure that people never vote with their wallets. One sure way to pick up votes is to promise to lower taxes. But if you promise that, you'd better deliver. Just ask George HW Bush, who won after promising no new taxes, then lost re-election when he reneged on that promise. Then there is the question of the evangelicals. Where did they stash their "Christian values" when they came out overwhelmingly in support of the pussy-grabbing, twice-divorced Donald Trump? It's been suggested that they were just being practical -- that they saw a chance to fill...

Why neither atheism nor science are "alternative religions": Reflections on NECSS 2017

I am, first and foremost, a skeptic. My lack of belief in deities or the supernatural is a product of my demand for evidence: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." But too often I've heard believers in a god or the immaterial assert that "atheism is just another religion," or that "skeptics have turned science into their religion." They're likely to try to attempt to wrap up discussions on the subject with, "You believe what you want, and I'll believe what I want." A few days ago, I departed New York City's Garment District after having attended an annual four-day conference known as NECSS -- the North East Conference on Science and Skepticism. Produced by the New York City Skeptics (of which I am a member), it brings together some of the finest minds in science and rationality, and attracts freethinkers and skeptics from all over the globe. At this year's conference, I had the pleasure of spending time with...

How could they have let it happen?

85 years after the rise of Nazism in Germany, it's tempting to look back and wonder, "How could so many ordinary Germans -- good people -- look at what was happening and not be alarmed? How could they just shrug and do nothing?" The fact is that, like the proverbial frog in a steadily warming pot of water, people can accommodate to nearly any worsening situation and come to think of it as "normal." Look at the United States today: "Oh, another mass shooting? What can you do?  There are just too many mentally ill people. Besides, it's just the price we pay for freedom." The fact that the rates of mental illness are the same in other countries that are just as free as we are, yet mass shootings are exceedingly rare in those places, never gets discussed by those in power. Or what about our attitudes towards the current administration? "Yeah, I know Trump mocked the disabled and made lewd comments about women, but that's because he's n...