Skip to main content

It's Not the Profits, It's What You Do to Maximize Them

When profit is the ultimate goal of any endeavor -- as it is for all commercial ventures -- the last step that directly leads to profit becomes the main focus. Let's look at insurance, for example. With car insurance, the insurer takes in money in the form of premiums, and pays out money in the form of settlements. It is obviously to the insurer's advantage to limit settlements in order to maximize profits. But since most settlements are paid when drivers have accidents, the company's focus becomes reducing the number of accidents -- and this is accomplished by incentivizing drivers to take safety courses by giving them a discount, as well as penalizing them for traffic infractions. In other words, a carrot and a stick. So the desire to maximize profits for the insurer leads to safer driving on the part of the insured. Double win.
Health insurance is different. Again, the insurer collects premiums, and pays out claims. Again, profits are maximized by limiting how much is paid in claims. But insurers have much less ability to influence how healthy or sick their customers are. Sure, they can penalize people for smoking or not getting an annual physical, but people still get sick through circumstances beyond their control. So the only way to reliably maximize profits is to limit access to care. And that translates to denying payment for treatments that the company deems too expensive, even if the doctor says they're necessary. A win for the insurer, but a loss for the patient, the doctor, and possibly the pharmacy too.
A more extreme example is the new trend toward for-profit prisons. Profits are maximized when prisons are full. Prisons are full when crime is high and/or sentences are stiff. So the owners of for-profit prisons are going to lobby for severe punishment rather than rehabilitation, which not only keeps more people incarcerated longer, but leads to more recidivism. This, in turn, drives up demand for more prison space, further increasing profits. A win for the prison operators -- but a big loss for the convicted, and for society in general.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Values? What Values?

A political columnist wrote that liberals should stop asking how poor whites in Middle America could keep voting against their own economic interests because it's the wrong question. "People don't vote with their wallets," he observed. "They vote for their values." And those values presumably have something to do with more guns, fewer immigrants, and no gays marrying each other. I'm not so sure that people never vote with their wallets. One sure way to pick up votes is to promise to lower taxes. But if you promise that, you'd better deliver. Just ask George HW Bush, who won after promising no new taxes, then lost re-election when he reneged on that promise. Then there is the question of the evangelicals. Where did they stash their "Christian values" when they came out overwhelmingly in support of the pussy-grabbing, twice-divorced Donald Trump? It's been suggested that they were just being practical -- that they saw a chance to fill...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why neither atheism nor science are "alternative religions": Reflections on NECSS 2017

I am, first and foremost, a skeptic. My lack of belief in deities or the supernatural is a product of my demand for evidence: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." But too often I've heard believers in a god or the immaterial assert that "atheism is just another religion," or that "skeptics have turned science into their religion." They're likely to try to attempt to wrap up discussions on the subject with, "You believe what you want, and I'll believe what I want." A few days ago, I departed New York City's Garment District after having attended an annual four-day conference known as NECSS -- the North East Conference on Science and Skepticism. Produced by the New York City Skeptics (of which I am a member), it brings together some of the finest minds in science and rationality, and attracts freethinkers and skeptics from all over the globe. At this year's conference, I had the pleasure of spending time with...
Post a Comment
Read more

How could they have let it happen?

85 years after the rise of Nazism in Germany, it's tempting to look back and wonder, "How could so many ordinary Germans -- good people -- look at what was happening and not be alarmed? How could they just shrug and do nothing?" The fact is that, like the proverbial frog in a steadily warming pot of water, people can accommodate to nearly any worsening situation and come to think of it as "normal." Look at the United States today: "Oh, another mass shooting? What can you do?  There are just too many mentally ill people. Besides, it's just the price we pay for freedom." The fact that the rates of mental illness are the same in other countries that are just as free as we are, yet mass shootings are exceedingly rare in those places, never gets discussed by those in power. Or what about our attitudes towards the current administration? "Yeah, I know Trump mocked the disabled and made lewd comments about women, but that's because he's n...
Post a Comment
Read more