Skip to main content

The Man Who Wasn't There

As I was going up the stair
I met a man who wasn't there
He wasn't there again today
Oh how I wish he'd go away!

-- "Antigonish," William Hughes Mearns, circa 1899

People who see real patterns and relationships that elude others are visionaries. There are very few if any in each generation. Anyone with a decent secondary education can tick off their names: Newton, Copernicus, Galileo, Darwin, Curie, Faraday, Einstein. There are others, of course -- but not that many, considering how many humans have trod the Earth since the Enlightenment. These giants did not set out to prove that their unfounded suspicions were correct, but simply to learn -- to find out how things worked and what caused what.

People who imagine patterns and relationships where none exist are either delusional in the psychotic sense, or simply willfully self-deluded. They start out already convinced of deliberately hidden, often nefarious connections between unconnected events, and then they hunt for the tiny tidbits of information that the gullible might construe as proof of those connections. They falsely connect dots that are terminally unconnected, and deduce cause and effect from mere coincidence. They then come away convinced that, through their own gifts of insight, they have special knowledge and understanding that eludes the masses. They and they alone have seen beyond the imaginary smokescreen constructed by diabolically clever government and/or industry types to hide reality, but that they in their wisdom and daring have yanked aside to reveal the truth. Thus, they satisfy their narcissistic need to be not just correct, but to be smarter than all the poor sheep foolish enough to believe career journalists who do dozens of hours of research before submitting a story for publication.

It's been said that the only thing more dangerous than ignorance is the illusion of knowledge. Whether it's advocating for the refusal of vaccinations based on a fraudulent study, or an anti-GMO campaign rooted in baseless fear, or any one of a number of other nonsensical beliefs about which people have become passionate, others suffer genuine harm as a result of these beliefs and the efforts carried out in their name: children who are permanently harmed or killed by measles outbreaks; Third World populations needlessly suffering blindness due to vitamin deficiencies that could have been prevented by genetically modified crops.

Skepticism is not synonymous with cynicism. Reject claims that do not have supporting evidence. Do not reject evidence just because it conflicts with your preconceived notions. Accept that even people, companies, or governments you don't personally like can possess good, solid information, and that not everyone who decides to follow the science instead of your pet peeve is a "sellout."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Values? What Values?

A political columnist wrote that liberals should stop asking how poor whites in Middle America could keep voting against their own economic interests because it's the wrong question. "People don't vote with their wallets," he observed. "They vote for their values." And those values presumably have something to do with more guns, fewer immigrants, and no gays marrying each other. I'm not so sure that people never vote with their wallets. One sure way to pick up votes is to promise to lower taxes. But if you promise that, you'd better deliver. Just ask George HW Bush, who won after promising no new taxes, then lost re-election when he reneged on that promise. Then there is the question of the evangelicals. Where did they stash their "Christian values" when they came out overwhelmingly in support of the pussy-grabbing, twice-divorced Donald Trump? It's been suggested that they were just being practical -- that they saw a chance to fill...

Why neither atheism nor science are "alternative religions": Reflections on NECSS 2017

I am, first and foremost, a skeptic. My lack of belief in deities or the supernatural is a product of my demand for evidence: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." But too often I've heard believers in a god or the immaterial assert that "atheism is just another religion," or that "skeptics have turned science into their religion." They're likely to try to attempt to wrap up discussions on the subject with, "You believe what you want, and I'll believe what I want." A few days ago, I departed New York City's Garment District after having attended an annual four-day conference known as NECSS -- the North East Conference on Science and Skepticism. Produced by the New York City Skeptics (of which I am a member), it brings together some of the finest minds in science and rationality, and attracts freethinkers and skeptics from all over the globe. At this year's conference, I had the pleasure of spending time with...

How could they have let it happen?

85 years after the rise of Nazism in Germany, it's tempting to look back and wonder, "How could so many ordinary Germans -- good people -- look at what was happening and not be alarmed? How could they just shrug and do nothing?" The fact is that, like the proverbial frog in a steadily warming pot of water, people can accommodate to nearly any worsening situation and come to think of it as "normal." Look at the United States today: "Oh, another mass shooting? What can you do?  There are just too many mentally ill people. Besides, it's just the price we pay for freedom." The fact that the rates of mental illness are the same in other countries that are just as free as we are, yet mass shootings are exceedingly rare in those places, never gets discussed by those in power. Or what about our attitudes towards the current administration? "Yeah, I know Trump mocked the disabled and made lewd comments about women, but that's because he's n...