Skip to main content

The Man Who Wasn't There

As I was going up the stair
I met a man who wasn't there
He wasn't there again today
Oh how I wish he'd go away!

-- "Antigonish," William Hughes Mearns, circa 1899

People who see real patterns and relationships that elude others are visionaries. There are very few if any in each generation. Anyone with a decent secondary education can tick off their names: Newton, Copernicus, Galileo, Darwin, Curie, Faraday, Einstein. There are others, of course -- but not that many, considering how many humans have trod the Earth since the Enlightenment. These giants did not set out to prove that their unfounded suspicions were correct, but simply to learn -- to find out how things worked and what caused what.

People who imagine patterns and relationships where none exist are either delusional in the psychotic sense, or simply willfully self-deluded. They start out already convinced of deliberately hidden, often nefarious connections between unconnected events, and then they hunt for the tiny tidbits of information that the gullible might construe as proof of those connections. They falsely connect dots that are terminally unconnected, and deduce cause and effect from mere coincidence. They then come away convinced that, through their own gifts of insight, they have special knowledge and understanding that eludes the masses. They and they alone have seen beyond the imaginary smokescreen constructed by diabolically clever government and/or industry types to hide reality, but that they in their wisdom and daring have yanked aside to reveal the truth. Thus, they satisfy their narcissistic need to be not just correct, but to be smarter than all the poor sheep foolish enough to believe career journalists who do dozens of hours of research before submitting a story for publication.

It's been said that the only thing more dangerous than ignorance is the illusion of knowledge. Whether it's advocating for the refusal of vaccinations based on a fraudulent study, or an anti-GMO campaign rooted in baseless fear, or any one of a number of other nonsensical beliefs about which people have become passionate, others suffer genuine harm as a result of these beliefs and the efforts carried out in their name: children who are permanently harmed or killed by measles outbreaks; Third World populations needlessly suffering blindness due to vitamin deficiencies that could have been prevented by genetically modified crops.

Skepticism is not synonymous with cynicism. Reject claims that do not have supporting evidence. Do not reject evidence just because it conflicts with your preconceived notions. Accept that even people, companies, or governments you don't personally like can possess good, solid information, and that not everyone who decides to follow the science instead of your pet peeve is a "sellout."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No, I Don't Empathize With Trump Voters

Today I watched a brief video before the main feature at my local independent cinema. It opened on a slide that said, "This is in response to recent events that have occurred as a consequence of changes in government policy." It then showed people of all races, religions, genders, and sexual orientations stating that we are all one, that our strength comes from our diversity. It was clear that it was intended as a refutation of Trump's immigration policy and Muslim ban. It received an enthusiastic round of applause from the 60 or so patrons seated in that theater in suburban Huntington, New York. I couldn't help but wonder what kind of reception it would have gotten in Mobile or Biloxi. Well, I wholeheartedly approve of the video's message. So is this going to be a Kumbaya moment, another olive branch shakily offered to Trump supporters, a heartfelt plea imploring, "Can't we all just get along?" In a word: NO. I for one am sick and tired of bei...

Gun Control: An Immodest Proposal

This is likely to be a rather unpopular blog entry. In fact, I may take as much heat from my friends on the left as from my enemies on the right. I'll be accused of "making a bad situation worse instead of better." I'll be accused of "playing right into the hands of the crazies." Maybe those who say that will ultimately be proven right. Nevertheless, hear me out. Or don't; you're free to choose just how wide or narrow your range of incoming information is. Anyway, what prompted me to write this was a news report I read this morning. It said that three Republican Senators, including Rand Paul from Kentucky, intend to block a bill that would expand background checks before gun sales, that has strong bipartisan support, and that Trump says he is eager to sign. This is essentially identical to what happened shortly after the Sandy Hook massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, when a bipartisan bill to expand background checks was blocked by two Republican Sen...